USPTO serial 75159902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FRONT ROYAL, VA
Front Royal, VA
Front Royal, VA
FRONT ROYAL, VA
Richmond, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS A. BOSHINSKI
Francine Miller MeadWestvaco Corp.501 South 5th St.Law Dept.Richmond, VA 23219-0501| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | composition books | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |