USPTO serial 75160294
EXCELNOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXCELNOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAYADEEP R DESHMUKH
JAYADEEP R DESHMUKH ELTECH SYSTEMS CORP625 E STFAIRPORT HARBOR, OH 44077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction, installation, maintenance, rebuilding, renovation, restoration and repair of electrolytic cells and of the components of such cells for the production of metals, in particular aluminum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |