USPTO serial 75160313
BETAWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KANG, JANE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BETAWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER TOGNINO
ALEXANDER TOGNINO IBM CORPN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used to download data and other computer software from a global computer network | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BETAWORKS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |