Drawing for TIME BLASTER

USPTO serial 75160318

TIME BLASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIME BLASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL CHUNG

PATRICK T PERKINS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009clock radiosABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 28, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 28, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 16, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 4, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 27, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance