Drawing for BASEMENT LEAK PLUG

USPTO serial 75160540

BASEMENT LEAK PLUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOPER, VANESSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BASEMENT LEAK PLUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VIVIEN Y TSANG

VIVIEN Y TSANG THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY101 PROSPECT AVE NW1100 MIDLAND BLDG LEGAL DEPTCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019hydraulic cement patching compoundABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 18, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 17, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 9, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 24, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance