Drawing for SPEER COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75160775

SPEER COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPEER COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD T COLBERT

EDWARD T COLBERT KENYON & KENYON1500 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1257UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic equipment for the recording, transmission, reproduction, broadcasting or storage of audio, video, or data, in digital electronic or magnetic tapes, discs, optical or other mediumACTIVE—
035preparing promotional and advertising visual and audiovisual displays in the fields of telecommunications and entertainment for othersACTIVE—
038telecommunication services, namely, satellite, cable and conventional television broadcasting services; radio broadcasting services; electronic transmission of voice, video and data for others via satellite and terrestrial means, namely, computer network, telephone wires and fiber opticsACTIVE—
039electronic storage of data, messages, and documents for othersACTIVE—
040videotape and audiotape reproduction servicesACTIVE—
041development, production, recording and distribution for others of educational and entertainment audiotapes, videotapes, digital audiotapes and audio or audiovisual CD-ROMs; videotape and audiotape recording and production for syndication services; radio, television and cable television program production servicesACTIVE—
042designing or consulting in the design of telecommunications, educational or entertainment services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 4, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1998NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Sep 16, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance