USPTO serial 75161031
GLOBALEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBALEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronoto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWIN KOMEN
EDWIN KOMEN CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used in the field of graphic design, multimedia, namely, the combining of image, text, video and audio signals, as well as computer programming and hyperlinking; computer graphics, namely, all and any images generated by computer or transferred to computer from sources including video tape or camera, film, animation and slides; and in the field of corporate communication, namely, providing an interface for the global, national, regional and closed computer communications networks | ACTIVE | May 1, 1996 |
| 038 | direct transmission and processing of live and pre-recorded video signals on global, national, regional and closed computer communications networks from a server to a browser at any band width using an optimized server-push protocol | ACTIVE | May 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |