USPTO serial 75161685
EMERALD PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERALD PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H GELLER
JAY H GELLER LAW OFFICE OF JAY H GELLER PCE TWR STE 6002425 W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | full line of skin care, hair care, body care, shaving care, nail care, baby care and color cosmetic preparations; sunscreens, sun blocks and suntanning preparations; potpourri; sachets; cologne and perfume; preparations to protect the skin from the sun, wind and environmental pollution; depilatories; talcum powder; premoistened towelettes; mouthwash; massage oil; essential oils for personal use; personal deodorants; antiperspirants; soap; and skin lightening preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | dietary and nutritional supplements; acne treatment and prevention preparations; topically applied antimicrobial and antibacterial preparations; medicated dundruff shampoos; medicated topically applied preparations to protect the skin from wind, sun and environmental pollution; medicated skin bleaching preparations; medicated douches, and non-medicated douches | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |