USPTO serial 75161782
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM K WEIMER
WILLIAM K WEIMER IMATION LEGAL AFFAIRSP O BOX 64898SAINT PAUL, MN 55164-0898UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | photographic chemicals; chemicals for use with sensitized films; chemicals for use with printing plates; unexposed and sensitized films, namely, photographic films, thermographic films, films for use in the production of a color proof; photosensitive contact paper; and transfer film for use in the production of a color proof | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer disk drives; blank and formatted computer tapes; blank and formatted computer tape cartridges; blank and formatted computer tape reels; computer tape reel collars for allowing self-threading of the tape into a tape drive; computer tape drives; re-writable optical disks; optical disk drives; head cleaning tapes for computer tape drives; tapes, and tape cartridges; paper card readers; laminators; computer printers; computers; fiber optic cables; electronic graphics controller boards; computer software for use in data storage, computer virus detection, data transport and communications, data archiving, imagery, medical imagery, graphic arts imagery, workflow of the printing process, image data management, image data processing, film imaging, film processing, and imaging of a printing plate | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer software design for others; computer services, namely, designing websites and data storage recovery services for others; and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |