Drawing for TRIAX RPV

USPTO serial 75161923

TRIAX RPV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIAX RPV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEVIN W GUYNN

KEVIN W GUYNN HILL STEADMAN & SIMPSON PC85TH FL SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal, manually actuated non-thermostatic valves adapted to be connected into fluid conductors for controlling the flow of fluid therethrough and parts thereofABANDONED—
007pneumatic and hydraulic actuators for non-thermostatic valves adapted to be connected into fluid conductors for controlling the flow of fluid therethrough and parts thereofABANDONED—
009remote operated non-thermostatic valves adapted to be connected into fluid connectors for controlling the flow of fluid therethrough, and parts thereofABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance