USPTO serial 75162535
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN CHURCHILL
BRIAN CHURCHILL LONG, DELAPOER, HEALY, MCCANN & NOONANP O BOX 40ALBANY, OR 97321UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | stationary, 3 ring binder covers, notepad covers, folder covers, bumper stickers, tablet paper, and note paper | ACTIVE | May 6, 1996 |
| 021 | glass mugs, decorative glass plates, glass coasters, non-precious metal serving trays, non-precious metal mugs | ACTIVE | May 6, 1996 |
| 025 | tee shirts, sweat shirts, polo shirts, neckties, jackets, basketball jerseys, baseball jerseys, track jerseys, volleyball jerseys, wind-resistant nylon jackets, sweatpants, athletic shorts, hats | ACTIVE | May 6, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |