USPTO serial 75162867
SPACE MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPACE MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1999 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |