Drawing for COTE D'AZUR

USPTO serial 75163688

COTE D'AZUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEST, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTE D'AZUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN ARTZ ASH

KAREN ARTZ ASH AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025swimwear and cover-ups for swimwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 25, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 20, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance