Drawing for LOW FAT & FAST

USPTO serial 75163722

LOW FAT & FAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOW FAT & FAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY S WEINSTEIN

2200 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazines in the field of cooking, fitness and health; magazine department directed to field of cooking, fitness and health; series of books in the field of cooking, fitness and healthABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 1998PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 23, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 8, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance