USPTO serial 75163790
DIGITAL AMUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL AMUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY FRANCES LOVE
MARY FRANCES LOVE WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | distribution of movie films; production and presentation of theatrical performances; providing of audio and video studios; rental of movie projectors and accessories; rental of movie films; rental of musical instruments; rental of ski equipment; rental of diving equipment; rental of television and radio sets; rental of audio recorded tapes and records; rental of recorded video tapes; planning, arranging and conducting seminars for the purpose of providing education in managing entertainment facilities; production of videos for cultural, entertainment and sports (exclusive of dramatic videos, broadcast program video and advertisement videos); rental of negative and positive films; rental of computer equipment and software for the purpose of providing entertainment with three-dimensional visual effects and sound effects, and production of movies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software and software system planning and design for others, rental of computer equipment and software for the purposes of providing entertainment with three-dimensional visual effects and sound effects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |