USPTO serial 75164635
SDL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2338937Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2000
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SDL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE R HARBOTTLE
MICHELLE R HARBOTTLE GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH PC400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | optoelectronic products, namely, optelectronic integrated circuits; optical amplifying devices, namely, flared or tapered amplifiers, alpha-DFB amplifiers, fiber amplifiers, fiber lasers and optical communication systems employing such amplifiers and lasers, namely, optical fiber amplifiers and lasers for use in CATV networks, telephone communication networks, wavelength division multiplexor networks printing and materials processing, and barcode scanning; laser devices for medical use, namely, fiber pigtail lasers, packaged pump laser diodes, thermoelectrically cooled pigtail lasers, analog laser diodes, monolithic master oscillator power amplifiers (MOPA), unstable resonators, DBR laser diodes, DFB lasers, alpha-DFB lasers, narrow spectrum grating used as an optical filter, stabilized lasers, multi-beam individually addressable laser arrays, multi-beam segment addressable laser arrays, diffraction-limited laser diodes, index guided laser diodes, high brightness laser diodes, external cavity lasers, tunable lasers, and optical heads sold as an integral part with at least one of the above named devices; optical semiconductor devices, namely, laser diode collimators, laser diode drivers, connectorized laser diodes and photodiode modules and flared or tapered amplifiers or laser diodes; fiber optic devices, namely, fiber gratings, optical couplers, optical filters, optical isolators, optical attenuators, optical collimators, multimode and single mode pigtail lasers, optical isolated pigtails, polarization preserving pigtails, optical transmission systems, namely, optical power transmission systems and telecommunication systems for digital and analog communications, namely, optical transmitter modules and optical receiver modules and an optical link between such modules; integrated laser systems, namely, integrated laser systems for selective soldering or desoldering or welding, heat treating or annealing, curing, transformation hardening, cutting, sculpting, shaving, photodynamic evaluation, and research and study, integrated circuits, namely, opto-electronic integrated circuits for optical power and light applications; and replacement parts for all of the foregoing, namely, control electronic parts in the nature of drivers, thermal management products and heatsinks; all for use as integral components of medical equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |