Drawing for OXFORD REDUCED PLASTIC SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75164681

OXFORD REDUCED PLASTIC SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OXFORD REDUCED PLASTIC SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blaine A. Page

Blaine A. Page Covidien LP15 Hampshire StreetMansfield, MA 02048UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009disposable pipette tips and containers therefor for laboratory use, sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 10, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 6, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 29, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance