USPTO serial 75164958
TY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LYKOS, ANGELA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westmont, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE A KATZ
JULIE A KATZ WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | providing information via a global computer network concerning applicant's products, namely, plush toys, history of each toy, games using the toys, games about the toys, stories about and photographs of the toys; providing information via a global computer network concerning applicant's patrons including consumers and enthusiasts of applicant's products, namely, stories about, stories, by, and photographs of the patrons | ABANDONED | Aug 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |