USPTO serial 75165249
BOWE SYSTEC-THE PAPER MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2534356Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2002
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOWE SYSTEC-THE PAPER MANAGEMENT COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
86159 Augsburg, DE
86159 Augsburg, DE
86159 Augsburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN J. HENRY
STEVEN J HENRY WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PCFEDERAL RESERVE PLZ600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for processing printed paper, plastic cards and envelopes and parts therefor, namely, envelope installations, supplement feeders, filling stations, sequence sorters, cutting machines, sheet feeders, envelope feeders, stream pockets, collection stations, tacking units, folding unit, and turning units; and electronic controllers therefor sold together with the above goods as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |