Drawing for SWIVEL CASTERS

USPTO serial 75165479

SWIVEL CASTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIVEL CASTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK R ROCHE

PATRICK R ROCHE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electrical vacuum cleaner for domestic useACTIVEApr 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 18, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 7, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 4, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance