Drawing for CONTROLNET

USPTO serial 75165652

CONTROLNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTROLNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN O SCOTT

STEVE D BYER BEYER WEAVER & THOMAS LLPPO BOX 70250OAKLAND, CA 94612-0250UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009network communication subsystems embodied in integrated circuits, circuit boards and subassemblies, namely, local-area and wide-area network transceivers, media access control devices, protocol analyzers and packet traffic generators all for operation, analysis and testing of high speed computer networks; and software for the operation, analysis and testing of high speed computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 25, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 29, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 16, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 1, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 19, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance