USPTO serial 75165750
ORLANDO PREDATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORLANDO PREDATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES D HARGROVE, ESQ.
CHARLES D HARGROVE ESQ SAVAGE-GASTON HOGAN & HARGROVE PA801 N MAGNOLIA AVE STE 402ORLANDO, FL 32803-3851UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | key chains | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1991 |
| 025 | sportswear and sports novelty goods, namely, pants, woven shirts, T-shirts, athletic jackets, sweat shirts, sweaters, athletic footwear, jerseys, athletic shirts, gym shorts, sweatbands, jogging outfits, woven skirts, and underwear for men, women, and children | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1991 |
| 028 | Christmas ornaments | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jul 1, 1991 |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of organizing, scheduling, and conducting football games | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Jul 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DeLuca, Stephen B.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ORLANDO PREDATORS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |