Drawing for CORNERSTONE

USPTO serial 75166102

CORNERSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORNERSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Gibson

JAMES M GIBSON FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs and instructional manuals, sold as a unit, for sales force automation applications in the pharmaceutical and health care industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 5, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 21, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance