USPTO serial 75166421
CLIPZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2000
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLIPZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
PEACHTREE CITY, GA
PEACHTREE CITY, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Winger; Christopher B. Schneider
LISA WINGER CHRISTOPHER B SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RD STE 100OAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | hair accessories, namely, barrettes, claw clips, and fabric wrapped elastic bands for ponytails | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |