Drawing for BE HERE

USPTO serial 75167035

BE HERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2487763Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2001
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BE HERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Mehok, Esq.

Michelle L. Mehok, Esq. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP12255 El Camino RealSuite 300San Diego, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CD-ROMs, compact discs, DVDs, laserdiscs [ and computer diskettes ] containing digital images and/or associated sounds for use by others in video games, commercials, promotional materials, videos and the like; computer software and hardware used for the capture, transmission and distribution of digital images and/or associated soundsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 28, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 17, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 5, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 11, 2001CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 9, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 9, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 9, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 9, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 3, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 16, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance