USPTO serial 75167701
SMARTSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cranston, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VANGELIS ECONOMOU
VANGELIS ECONOMOU DORN MCEACHRAN JAMBOR & KEATING55 E MONROE ST STE 2940CHICAGO, IL 60603-5880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | seal and pump monitoring system, comprised of motion, temperature, and pressure sensors and computer hardware and software for measuring and monitoring three axes of acceleration at the seal gland plate, the pressure which measures three axes of acceleration at the seal gland plate as well as the pressure and temperature of liquid media being pumped, seal emissions, carbon seal insert temperature, and pump shaft speed | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |