USPTO serial 75169539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | direct mail marketing, concept, creative, photography, art, design, typesetting, film output, printing, bindery, computer services, imaging, mailing lists, lettershop services, analysis, fulfillment, consulting | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |