Drawing for LITTLE TIGER

USPTO serial 75169949

LITTLE TIGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITTLE TIGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL J DUFFY

DANIEL J DUFFY CASSEM, TIERNEY, ADAMS ET AL8805 INDIAN HILLS DR STE 300OMAHA, NE 68114-9676UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028golf equipment for children only, namely, golf bags and golf clubs, excluding golf ballsACTIVEMar 3, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 26, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 28, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1997CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Nov 18, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 14, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance