USPTO serial 75170491
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUEST DIAGNOSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY M BROWN
JAY M BROWN QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC33608 ORTEGA HWYSAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92690UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | clinical laboratory management services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |