Drawing for SYNCHROLINE

USPTO serial 75171483

SYNCHROLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNCHROLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JESS M COLLEN

JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetic skin creams, body creams, sun creams, facial creams, cosmetic body and skin milks and cosmetic moisturizing facial milks; body emulsions and facial emulsions; facial masks and skin moisturizers; eye gels, styling gels, bath gels and facial moisturizing gelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 20, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 4, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 4, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance