Drawing for FERNANDO'S

USPTO serial 75171917

FERNANDO'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERNANDO'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK C. STEPHENSON

PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC222 S 15TH ST STE 1400OMAHA, NE 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030frozen, prepared food products, namely, burritos, enchiladas, taquitors, tacos, tamales, and chimichungasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 25, 2000EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Jun 12, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance