USPTO serial 75172047
SMARTPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEAL S GREENFIELD
NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER PC400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-0299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digitizers and accessories therefore; digitizer tablets; touch screens; LCD's; transponders and accessories therefore; chip cards; computer hardware and software for use in digitizing and verification of a human signature; computer hardware and software for remote control; computer hardware and software for identification of a user; computer hardware and software for storing a personal identification code or number; electronic security systems; computer hardware and software for gaining access to a computer system or network; computer hardware and software for storing data and electronic cash; electronic personal identification device, namely, the combination of a chip card with a digitizer used for digitizing and verification of a human signature; electronic pressure sensors and/or speed sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |