Drawing for TOTO

USPTO serial 75172093

TOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, CHRISTINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alfred R. Cowger, Esq.

ALFRED R COWGER ESQ DANA CLASSIC FRAGRANCES INCPO BOX 299HARVEYS LAKE, PA 18618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003perfumes, colognes, toilet waters, hand and body skin creams, hand and body skin lotions, bath oils, bath gels, bath foams, body talcum powder, hand and body soapABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance