USPTO serial 75173025
BENGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW D BROOKS
ANDREW D BROOKS THOMAS MORT & PROSSER LLP3403 TENTH ST STE 300RIVERSIDE, CA 92501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | wholesale distributorship featuring heavy vehicles, equipment, and earth moving machines, namely, bulldozers; grader; loaders; scarifies; scrapers; trash compactors; backhoes; earth loaders; front end loaders; industrial skid steer loaders; industrial trash compacting machines; industrial waste grinding machines; mobile scalping, shredding, screening and stockpiling machines and conveyers; composting machines; wind turbines; materials handling machines, namely, forklifts; internal combustion engines for machine operation; electric motors for machines; articulated and rigid frame on and off-highway trucks | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1988 |
| 037 | maintenance and repair of heavy vehicles, equipment, and earth moving machines, namely, bulldozers; grader; loaders; scarifies; scrapers; trash compactors; backhoes; earth loaders; front end loaders; industrial skid steer loaders; industrial trash compacting machines; industrial waste grinding machines; mobile scalping, shredding, screening and stockpiling machines and conveyers; composting machines; wind turbines; materials handling machines, namely, forklifts; internal combustion engines for machine operation; electronic motors for machines; articulated and rigid frame on the off-highway trucks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |