USPTO serial 75173100
ABBEY PARTY RENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABBEY PARTY RENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDY KRUGER
JUDY KRUGER BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPS TWR PENNZOIL PL711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2900HOUSTON, TX 77002-2781Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail outlet services in the field of party supplies | ACTIVE | Jun 22, 1984 |
| 042 | rental of party equipment and furniture, namely, tables, chairs, silverware, china, tents, temporary lighting, electrical power cables and generators, and related items, for use at special events, parties, conventions, meetings, and the like | ACTIVE | Jun 22, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |