USPTO serial 75173546
BIO SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EHARD, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J BROWN
MICHAEL J BROWN GRAHAM & JAMES LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fish (not live); fish fillets; fish stock; meat; preserved meat; meat extracts; preserved, cooked, dried and frozen vegetables and fruits; jellies; jams; and milk products, namely, milk and chocolate milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | flour and ready to eat cereal derived food bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |