Drawing for DOT NET

USPTO serial 75174010

DOT NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOT NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN M SCHAETZEL

BIPCO BELLSOUTH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP824 MARKET ST STE 901WILMINGTON, DE 19801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software which facilitates searching for and transferring information across global computer communications networks, and for the execution of business transactions using global computer communications networksACTIVE—
035advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others via placement of advertisements in non-interactive and interactive on-line multimedia programs and publications accessed through computer, television and telecommunications networks; billing services and data processing servicesACTIVE—
036financial information provided by electronic meansACTIVE—
038telecommunications services; namely, electronic transmission of data, sound, text, image messages, video and documents via computer, television and telecommunications networks; telecommunications gateway services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic mail services; electronic store-and-forward messaging services; and network conferencing servicesACTIVE—
042providing mulitple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance