USPTO serial 75175348
ACTIVIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. HELLWEGE
JAMES W HELLWEGE JONES TULLAR & COOPER2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1002ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3617UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals used in the manufacture of nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | dairy-based, vegetable-based, whey-based, soy-based and chocolate food beverages, snack food dips, fish for food purposes, fruit based snack foods, game, processed fruits, potato-based snack foods, proteins for use as food additives and food fillers, and salmon for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | processed foods containing nutritional supplements, namely, grain-based and herbal beverages; cereal, rice and wheat-based snack foods; cereal derived food bars; malt extracts for food; malt for food purposes; food flavorings; food additives for use as flavorings, ingredients or fillers; food bars; food starch; herbal teas; and package combinations consisting of bread, crackers, and cookies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterHealth Nutritionals Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by InterHealth Nutritionals Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ACTIVIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2001 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2001 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |