Drawing for MAXIPOINT

USPTO serial 75176285

MAXIPOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIPOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A KILLWORTH

RICHARD A KILLWORTH KILLWORTH GOTTMAN HAGAN & SCHAEFF LLP1 DAYTON CTR STE 5001 S MAIN STDAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009identification and data storage systems for items which are movable and/or subjected to varying positions and/or conditions comprised of durable data storage units securable to such items in the nature of touch button memory, contact memory and memory chips; portable devices for reading data from and writing data to such data units in the nature of hand held read/write devices which communicate with durable data storage units by contact therewith; components for identification and data storage systems for items which are movable and/or subjected to varying positions and/or conditions, namely, durable data storage units securable to such items in the nature of touch button memory, contact memory and memory chips; portable devices for reading data from and writing data to such data units in the nature of hand held read/write devices which communicate with durable data storage units by contact therewithABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance