USPTO serial 75176384
IDID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
117 94 STOCKHOLM, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN S JENNINGS
JONATHAN S JENNINGS PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs including programs for the issuing of digital ID documents (certificate), for the personalization of smart cards (coded cards) and of other bearers of a digital ID document, for the publication of digital ID documents in PC's, servers and central computers, for the identification of digital signatures and coding in different applications, e.g. security solutions, electronic trade, electronic bank services, electronic mail, games, gambling and betting, electronic checks, cable and satellite television, for copyright protection of software, documents or multimedia additions; smart cards (coded cards); newspapers, magazines and printed matter stored on electronic media | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer programming, updating and design of software, consultation concerning security issues, coding, digital identification, leasing of access time to data bases | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |