USPTO serial 75176508
SUMMER KNIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUMMER KNIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J GREENSTONE
RICHARD J GREENSTONE Attorneys & Counselors at Law5885 Doyle StreetEmeryville, CA 94608United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | sexual advice columns in adult-oriented magazines | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |