USPTO serial 75176704
ADAMS APPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2895962Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADAMS APPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, M6C 3L6, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, M6C 3L6, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, M6C 3L6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLAUDIA STANGLE
CLAUDIA STANGLE LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6745Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sports shoes; hats; clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweat shirts, [ jumpsuits, ] pants, jackets, sports jackets, undergarments, namely, shorts and shirts, socks, bath robes, scarves, and neck ties | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |