USPTO serial 75177238
CHEF COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEF COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, H4S 1S5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL FIELDS
PAUL FIELDS DARBY & DARBY805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | housewares and kitchen gadgets, namely, wire whisks, cake decoration bags and nozzles, icing sets comprising nozzles and tips, cheese planes and slicers, ice cream scoops, fondue forks, cookie cutters, nylon basters, kitchen ladles, flexible turners, nylon whisks, kitchen tongs, steak hammers, rolling pins, flour sifters, metal strainers, manual can openers, corkscrews, vegetable steamer baskets, holders to secure fresh onions for slicing, a full line of plastic kitchen utensils, salt and pepper sets, measuring cups, pastry brushes and lemon zesters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |