USPTO serial 75177339
COMBIBLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMBIBLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET M POWERS
ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | scientific apparatus, namely, a reaction grid and components in the nature of a vortexer, namely, a device used to shake or agitate the chemical reaction vessels on the reaction block, combinatorial chemistry software, a heating block, and computer hardware and software for robotic liquid handling, all for synthesis of chemical compounds, excluding any such use of the described product for containers, boxes, or packaging materials made of paper, paperboard or cardboard or packaging machines in the food or beverage industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |