USPTO serial 75177700
SUMMERBLOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2174061Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 1998
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUMMERBLOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
7523 XC Enschede, NL
7523 XC Enschede, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK J COLUCCI
FRANK J COLUCCI COLUCCI & UMANSMANHATTAN TWR101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beers; non-alcoholic malt beverages | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1999 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 26, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |