USPTO serial 75178262
MARISA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARISA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT COHEN
HERBERT COHEN WIGMAN COHEN LEITNER & MYERS PCTHE FARRAGUT BLDG900 17TH ST NW STE 1000 10TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, sweaters, blouses, jackets, blazers, pants, skirts, dresses, and coats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |