USPTO serial 75178373
SWISSTOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWISSTOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN P CLANCY
KAREN P CLANCY NIMS HOWES COLLISON HANSEN & LACKERT605 THIRD AVE STE 3500NEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | manually operated multiple function folding instruments consisting of various implements, namely, pliers, screwdrivers, wire cutter, cap lifter, knife blades, file, saws, wire bender, wire stripper, wire scraper, can opener, ruler, electrical crimper, chisel/scraper, reamer/punch and crate opener | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |