Drawing for ARTISAN

USPTO serial 75178461

ARTISAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTISAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN R GARBER

TRADEMARK UNIT HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYCORPORATE LAW DEPTHARTFORD PLZHARTFORD, CT 06115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036life insurance underwriting servicesACTIVEDec 10, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 25, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 12, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 23, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance