Drawing for DAILY CRUNCH

USPTO serial 75178475

DAILY CRUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAILY CRUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN F MAJESTIC

MARTIN F MAJESTIC MAJESTIC PARSONS SIEBERT & HSUE4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplementsABANDONEDAug 19, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 27, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 14, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance