USPTO serial 75178733
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP J ANDERSON
Robert Ryan Morishita MORISHITA LAW FIRM, LLC4955 S. Durango Drive, Suite 153Las Vegas, NV 89148UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | casino game wherein concentric spinning rings have representations of playing cards and are used to select poker hands | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |